Microsoft is again providing comprehensive global threat intelligence and guidance to help enterprises manage risk and address security challenges. This morning, we released Volume 14 of the Microsoft Security Intelligence Report (SIRv14). This new report studies our findings on trends in the threat landscape based on data from more than 1 billion systems worldwide, focusing on data collected in the second half of 2012. The infection trends is continually going down in South Africa (download report here South Africa SIRv14) while the worms are stubbornly remaining just above 40% of the computers reporting detections. Worms, Miscellaneous Potentially Unwanted Software and Miscellaneous Trojans detected in the fourth quarter of 2012 (4Q12) have all increased in percentage compared to 3Q12. South Africans have increased their trends of downloading tools that generate product keys for various software products eventually infecting their computers with win32/Keygen. Detections of Win32/Keygen, the most common detection overall in 2H12, increased each quarter, from 4.8 million computers in 2Q12 to 6.8 million in 4Q12 worldwide.
Running unprotected: Measuring the benefits of real-time security software
Practicing safe browsing habits, such as using a web browser with built-in safety features and paying attention to alerts and warnings encountered while browsing, is one of the most important steps Internet users can take to protect themselves from malicious software (malware). Nevertheless, it can sometimes be difficult for even experienced Internet users to avoid coming into contact with malware. The cybercriminals who publish and distribute malware devote significant effort to convincing or tricking Internet users into clicking links that lead to malware, or that download malicious attachments or applications. Even familiar and trusted websites can sometimes be exploited by attackers to distribute malware using tactics such as drive-by downloads.
An antivirus or antimalware product that offers real-time protection is one of the most crucial defenses a computer user has against these and other malware distribution tactics. Unfortunately, many computers are not protected by real-time antimalware software, either because no such software has been installed, because it has expired, or because it has been disabled intentionally by the user or secretly by malware. New data analysed by Microsoft (see the figure above) reveals the magnitude of the additional risk that such computers and their users face: in the second half of 2012 (2H12), computers that did not have real-time antimalware protection were more than 5 times as likely to be infected with malware and potentially unwanted software as computers that did have protection.
To find out if they are using valid and up-to-date Antivirus, Microsoft recommends that people go to their system control panel to check their computer’s security settings. If they do not have Antivirus installed, they can download it from a trusted vendor. If you have Windows 8, then Microsoft’s Antivirus is already built into the system.
South Africa’s Threat Intelligence
Except where specified, this information was compiled from telemetry data that was generated from more than 600 million computers worldwide and some of the busiest online services on the Internet. Infection rates are given in computers cleaned per mille (CCM), or thousand, and represent the number of reported computers cleaned in a quarter for every 1,000 executions of the Windows® Malicious Software Removal Tool, which is available through Microsoft Update and the Microsoft Safety & Security Center website.
|
Metric |
1Q12 |
2Q12 |
3Q12 |
4Q12 |
|
Computers cleaned per 1,000 executions (CCM) for South Africa |
7.9 |
6.9 |
6.4 |
6.5 |
|
Worldwide average CCM |
6.6 |
7.0 |
5.3 |
6.0 |
The table above shows the infection trends in South Africa. We detected malware on 6.5 of every 1,000 computers scanned in South Africa in 4Q12. The below shows the infection rate (CCM) by operating system and service pack in 4Q12. This data is normalized; that is, the infection rate for each version of Windows is calculated by comparing an equal number of computers per version (for example, 1,000 Windows XP SP3 computers to 1,000 Windows 8 RTM computers).
The figure below shows the computers cleaned per mile (CCM) of malicious and potentially unwanted software trend for South Africa over the last six quarters, compared to the world as a whole. While the graph shows a promising decrease in infections both locally and worldwide, our infection rate is consistently above the worldwide average.
Threat categories
The figure above shows the threat categories in SA in 4Q12. Worms are still the most common category in South Africa, which affected 41.2% of all computers with detections, up from 39.9% in 3Q12. The second most common category was Miscellaneous Potentially Unwanted Software, which affected 36.1% of all computers with detections, up from 32.9% in 3Q12. The third most common category was Miscellaneous Trojans, which affected 26.8% of all computers with detections, up from 26.0% in 3Q12
Threat families
|
Family |
Most Significant Category |
% of Computers With Detections |
|
|
1 |
INF/Autorun |
Misc. Potentially Unwanted Software |
18.0% |
|
2 |
Win32/Vobfus |
Worms |
12.9% |
|
3 |
Win32/Keygen |
Misc. Potentially Unwanted Software |
12.4% |
|
4 |
Win32/Rimecud |
Misc. Trojans |
6.7% |
|
5 |
Win32/Dorkbot |
Worms |
5.6% |
|
6 |
Win32/Nuqel |
Worms |
5.5% |
|
7 |
Win32/Virut |
Viruses |
5.2% |
|
8 |
JS/IframeRef |
Misc. Trojans |
5.2% |
|
9 |
Win32/Folstart |
Worms |
4.7% |
|
10 |
Win32/Sality |
Viruses |
4.7% |
The table above shows the top 10 malware and potentially unwanted software families in South Africa in 4Q12. The most common threat family in SA in 4Q12 was INF/Autorun, which affected 18% of computers with detections. INf/Autorun is a family of worms that spreads by copying itself to the mapped drives of an infected computer. The mapped drives may include network or removable drives. The second most common threat family in SA in 4Q12 was still Win32/Vobfus, which affected 12.9% of computers with detections. Win32/Vobfus is a family of worms that spreads via network drives and removable drives and download/executes arbitrary files. Downloaded files may include additional malware. The third most common threat family in SA in 4Q12 was still Win32/Keygen, which affected 12.4% of computers. A notable increase compared to 9.2% in 2Q12. Win32/Keygen is a generic detection for tools that generate product keys for various software products. The fourth most common threat family in SA in 4Q12 was still Win32/Rimecud, which affected 6.7% of computers with detections. A notable decrease compared to 8.5% in 2Q12. Win32/Rimecud is a family of worms with multiple components that spread via fixed and removable drives and via instant messaging. It also contains backdoor functionality that allows unauthorized access to an affected system.
Malicious Websites
The figure above shows phishing sites per 1,000 Internet hosts for locations around the world in 4Q12. Attackers often use websites to conduct phishing attacks or distribute malware. Malicious websites typically appear completely legitimate and often provide no outward indicators of their malicious nature, even to experienced computer users. In many cases, these sites are legitimate websites that have been compromised by malware, SQL injection, or other techniques, in an effort by attackers to take advantage of the trust users have invested in them. To help protect users from malicious webpages, Microsoft and other browser vendors have developed filters that keep track of sites that host malware and phishing attacks. Detections of the generic family JS/IframeRef increased fivefold in 4Q12 after falling off significantly between 2Q12 and 3Q12 worldwide. IframeRef is a generic detection for specially formed HTML inline frame (IFrame) tags that redirect to remote websites that contain malicious content. The increased IframeRef detections in 2Q12 and 4Q12 resulted from the discovery of a pair of widely used new variants in April and November 2012. (In January 2013, these variants were reclassified as Trojan:JS/Seedabutor.A and Trojan:JS/Seedabutor.B, respectively.)
|
Metric |
3Q12 |
4Q12 |
|
Phishing sites per 1000 hosts |
8.26 |
8.98 |
|
Malware hosting sites per 1000 hosts |
12.18 |
13.68 |
|
Drive-by download sites per 1000 URLs |
0.50 (0.56) |
0.36 (0.33) |
Note: To provide a more accurate perspective on the phishing and malware landscape, the methodology used to calculate the number of Internet hosts in each country or region has been revised. For this reason, the statistics presented here should not be directly compared to findings in previous volumes. Web browsers such as Windows Internet Explorer and search engines such as Bing use lists of known phishing and malware hosting websites to warn users about malicious websites before they can do any harm. The information presented in this section has been generated from telemetry data produced by Internet Explorer and Bing. The figure below shows malware distribution sites per 1,000 Internet hosts for locations around the world in 4Q12. SmartScreen Filter detected 10.8 malware hosting sites per 1,000 Internet hosts worldwide in 4Q12.
Protecting the Enterprise.
Effective Mitigations
The good news is that enterprises can protect themselves using a number of mitigations, including:
- Keep all software up-to-date: attackers are trying to use vulnerabilities in all sorts of software from different vendors, so organizations need to keep all of the software in their environment up to date, and run the latest versions of software whenever possible. This will make it harder for the types of threats we now see in the enterprise to be successful.
- Demand software that was developed with a security development lifecycle: until you get a software update from the affected vendor, test it, and deploy it, it’s important that you manage the risk that attackers will attempt to compromise your environment using these vulnerabilities. A very effective way for software vendors to help you do this is by using security mitigations built into the platform, such as ASLR, DEP, SEHOP and others. These mitigations can make it much harder for attackers to successfully exploit vulnerabilities. Demand software from your vendors that use these mitigations. You can check if the software you have in your environment have these mitigations turned on, using a tools like Binscope or EMET. In cases where you have software deployed in your environment that do not use these mitigations, in some cases EMET might be able to turn them on for you. These mitigations can help you manage risk by giving you more time to test and deploy security updates or new versions of software.
- Restrict websites: limiting the web sites that enterprise information workers can surf to, will reduce the chances of being exposed to the types of attackers we now see in the enterprise. This likely won’t be popular in the office, but given that 70% of the top threats found in the enterprise are delivered via malicious websites, you might have the data you need to make the business case. Restricting web access from servers has been a best practice for a long time.
- Manage security of your websites: many organizations don’t realize that their websites could be hosting the malicious content that is being used in these attacks. Organizations should regularly assess their own web content to avoid a compromise that could affect their customers and their reputation.
- Leverage network security technologies: technologies like Network Access Protection (NAP), IPS, and content filtering can provide an additional layer of defense by providing a mechanism for automatically bringing network clients into compliance (a process known as remediation) and then dynamically increasing its level of network access.
Response Process
It is important that organizations also take the time to assess their response processes to help ensure they are prepared should their systems become compromised or attacked. In order to assist organizations with this evaluation, Microsoft just released a free Security Response Readiness Assessment.This resource also helps identify next steps that can be taken to improve security response processes and help to identify, monitor, respond, and resolve security incidents and vulnerabilities in the IT environment. You should also have a look at Microsoft’s Free Security Tools – Microsoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) ToolkitIt to facilitate platform migration.
It is Microsoft’s hope that this report serves as a helpful resource for IT professionals when working to better the security efforts of their company, government departments and organizations.
